2:00 pm -3:00 pm, Saturday,
October 4, 2008. Location: Cumberland Presbyterian
Church at the corner of Academy and Moon. Park in the back (south
side), we are in the Adult Education wing, just inside the door (Rm 403).
Topic: No speaker this month, just a business meeting |
| Given the breadth, depth, and severity of the problems
evidenced on this web site and throughout New Mexico, who is "minding
the store", so to speak, and taking care of the unlawful, harmful,
and systematic practices that tear families apart and deplete their
resources, while enriching members of the cottage industry? This section
covers what offices and persons have been approached or have knowledge
of specific problems and what, if anything, each office/person is
doing to correct them. |
| Twenty years ago, an organization similar to the
Center for Family Justice, Parents Against Domestic Court Abuse, exposed
systematic wrongdoing in the Bernalillo Family Court and associated
cottage industry that was harming families. They approached all three
branches of government, legislative, judicial, and executive, and
demanded action. As a result, then-Chief Justice of the New Mexico
Supreme Court Tony Scarborough commissioned a group to investigate
the allegations regarding the Bernalillo Family Court and formally
report back to him. On August 29, 1988, James T. Paulantis and his
committee issued their report, now known as the Paulantis
report, with significant findings and recommendations. We provide
herein a brief summary of the report: |
- comments were made about the increasingly crowded Bernalillo
County Family Court docket, and that the docket could be cleared
if "it were not for the reopening of cases and continuing
jurisdiction in all cases where children were involved."
- the Court relied too heavily on the custody evaluation which
was expensive and was not always tempered with other, conflicting
evidence; the Court should exercise closer control to eliminate
the impression that the evaluator, social worker, etc. is making
the decisions
- many meetings and hearings were not of record and all such matters
should be of record
- the committee in numerous cases was disturbed by the reports
of attorney's fees in domestic relations cases
- many reopen/rehearing issues were frivolous
- it was taking an inordinate amount of time from the time a case
was filed until all issues were concluded, and the longer the
time taken, the more expensive the case
- a time limit should be set on final judgment of all issues;
the report stated, "In domestic relations cases a speedy
resolution is necessary because of the emotional traumatic nature
of such cases." [sic]
- in some cases there were several or numerous attorneys representing
one or more litigants (i.e., through withdrawal and substitution)
- New Mexico Rule 1-011 [regarding fraud on the part of attorneys
to the Court and in pleadings] deviates from Federal case law
and should be modified to more closely conform to the Federal
case law in order to make attorneys more responsible to the courts
|
| As a result of this report, likely paid for by
New Mexico tax dollars, to our knowledge the following actions were
taken: In other words,
the Courts have known of these problems, which have simply become
an order of magnitude worse over the last two decades; families continue
to be abused by the court system, both family and children's Courts,
and no action has been taken to alleviate the problem. If you read
this account and can point us to any action, however small, that addressed
any of these issues at all, we will be happy to revise our account. |
| last updated on
October 7, 2007
|
|